Latest Blogs

from the Emerging Business Team

Don Dodge on The Next Big Thing

How much equity for investors and employees?

Entrepreneurs face some pretty tough questions at a very early stage. Should I take Angel or VC money? How much money should I raise? How much equity should I give up? How much equity should I grant to early employees? There are some guidelines, but every situation is different.

Paul Graham wrote a blog "The Equity Equation" 1/(1-n), which basically says "You should give up n% of your company if what you trade it for improves your average outcome enough that what you have left is worth more than the whole company was before."  For example, if you take $1 Million from a VC in exchange for 33% of your company, it is a good deal if the company is worth 50% more as a result. Theoretically you owned 100% of a $2M company before the investment, and now you own 66% of a company worth $3M.

Both the entrepreneur and the investor have much higher expectations than just "even money" on their bet. The entrepreneur expects the company to be worth many times this valuation and so does the investor. VCs and Angels can add tremendous value to a growing company, and it is in their best interest to work hard for you.

Shouldn't the entrepreneur negotiate to only give up 20% of the company for $1M? The short answer is that the company is only worth whatever a competitive group of investors is willing to pay at that point in time. The key is to have several VCs or investors competing for the deal to arrive at a "fair" valuation. It isn't always possible to have a competitive bidding situation at each financing round so here are some guidelines for funding sources and percentages.

Friends & Family can usually raise between $30K and $300K and usually take an interest bearing note that is convertible into stock at the next financing.

Angels will usually invest between $300K and $2M. They often take a convertible note too, but with warrants for additional shares or a discount on Series A shares. No loss of equity, at least until they convert at Series A.

VCs want to put in $2M to $8M and usually want 30% to 50% of the company. So they will give you a pre-money valuation somewhere around the amount you raise. Sounds strange, but it usually works out that if you are raising $2M the VCs will value your company at $2M pre-money, and $4M post money so they end up with 50% of the stock. If you are raising $5M they will typically value your company at $5M pre-money. The theory is that if they trust you and your business plan enough to give you $5M, then you have probably created something that is already worth $5M.

The second and third rounds of funding take additional shares of equity and dilute existing investors and founders. Founders usually end up with 10% to 20%, all the other employees end up with about 15%, and the VCs end up with about 60% to 75%.

How much money should I take? Marc Andreessen says take all you can get. My simple answer is a little more than you need to reach the next milestone. Don't cut it too close. Things will take longer than you project, some things will go wrong, and it always take longer to raise money than you think it will. So, figure out how much you need to fund you for a year, or to your next milestone, then add 50% as a safety cushion. That is how much you should raise.

Shouldn't I raise as little as possible now and raise more later at a higher valuation? Great in theory, that is what you hope to do. But, don't cut it too close. Give yourself some extra cash and runway to get to the next level. Companies fail because they run out of cash. This sounds simple but think long and hard about this. Companies fail because they run out of cash...they usually don't fail when they have too much cash in the bank.

Don't worry about giving up too much equity at an early stage. If the company is successful you will be very rich. If it isn't successful then holding 60% versus 30% won't matter anyway.

How much equity should be given to employees? This is another tough question but there are some broad guidelines. To use Paul Graham's theory, you should give that superstar employee enough stock to keep them, and in return they should add double the value you gave up. If you give up 1% equity for an employee, they should add 2% of value to the company. That is much harder than you might imagine.

A basic rule is that each level of the organization should get about one half the options as the level above. If a VP level person gets 100,000 shares, then a director level person might get 50,000, and a manager/supervisor might get 25,000 shares. Here are some "average" guidelines for equity percentages at a liquidity event. They start out higher and get diluted down to these levels after multiple rounds of financing;

  • CEO - 4%
  • VPs - 1% each
  • Director level - .5%
  • Managers - .25%
  • Individuals - .05

Now, lets do the math for a company that has 100 employees. The VCs will end up with about 60% to 75% of the company depending on how much was raised and how many rounds. Founders and VPs usually have about 10% and employees have about 15%.

The CEO will have 2% to 4% depending on when they joined or if they are a founder. Lets say you have a non-founder CEO and two founders who are VPs; they will account for 6% of the stock. There will probably be 4 other VP level people with 1% each. That is a total of 10% for founders and execs.

You might have five directors with .5% each and ten manager/supervisors with .25% each for a total of 5% equity. Then you have about 75 individual contributors at a variety of levels, but on average they hold .05% each for a total of about 4%. So, founders and execs end up with about 10%, directors and managers get 5%, and individual contributors account for another 5% collectively, for a total of 20% of the company.

Should I sell the company now for $5M or hold out for a $100M exit 5 to 7 years down the line? This sounds like a "no brainer" but it really depends on what stage you are at and how much equity you have given up. If you are one of three founders holding 33% of the company a $5M exit gets you $1,667,000. If you build the company to 100 employees and sell it for $100M you will probably end up with about $2M. See the equity percentages above to understand how I got to $2M.

Talk to other entrepreneurs - These are tough questions. Every situation is different. The investment market conditions change all the time. What worked three years ago may not work today. Experienced entrepreneurs who have "been there - done that" are your best source of advice. They have lived it and most often are happy to help a fellow entrepreneur. Good luck!

Published Monday, August 13, 2007 8:53 AM by Don Dodge

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Evonne said:

i have someone that will be consulting only.  20 hours a week.  refused to be an employee and be PT.  

she is asking for hourly rate but plus over 5% equity in the company.  

is this normal? everyone I have spoken with says no.

She does know people in the industry, but the line of work would not be dependent on her. She is an engineer and it would be beneficial to have her on board, but with her only being available 20 hours a week, i am not sure how much i could rely on her other than just being a techinical advisor.

I am confused about her demands.  Is this unusual for a consultant to ask for?

Thanks.

January 14, 2008 3:03 AM
 

Don Dodge said:

This is very unusual. Most VPs don't get 5% at a startup. See the chart above.

Don

January 14, 2008 7:20 AM
 

Evonne said:

Thanks Don.

I sent her the Chart and she responded.

She got back to my citing the section i pasted below (under Equity). She had asked how much each stock was worth, but since we haven't even finished our seed round, there isn't really any value.  My attorney said that for her to base her shares of equity by how much value each stock is doesn't make any sense.

I have a VP of Biz Dev type that has been with me FT since November. He will not be a founder and will be receiving 5% of equity. He also has not been receiving any salary at all. He is committed to seeing the company succeed.

Also, i have a CFO type that has been creating the financial model. He is being paid a flat rate. No equity.

I just don't understand why she feels that she deserves to be founder or receive so much equity. She is claiming that because she will be involved in the initial stages that this is the reason why. But then wouldn't the CFO and VP Biz Dev guy deserve the same thing? Or any other person that helps the company out by making a beneficial relationship?

Again, i have offered a consultant position only to her. She would not be part of the set up of processes/procedures, but be a technical advisor when needed.  She is really smart and good and would be of great benefit to us.  But I could get someone else that might be a little slower and rougher around the edges.

What she wrote to me:

EQUITY ..

First, my attorney thinks that there is some value in the company as there are some tangible assets to the company.  For example, since the corporation has already been set up, any fees, permits and licenses paid for in the course of setting up the company go toward the valuation of that company.  Likewise, any work that has already been done to develop internal documentation, procedures, website including the space, resources all count toward the value of the company.  In short, at a minimum the company is worth the fair market value of all of its tangible assets minus any current debt.

The value of the shares is then derived from the value of the company. If the company is worth, say, $50,000, and 5,000,000 shares have been allocated, then each share is worth ($50K/50M shares) $0.01 per share. I think you already know this. In any case, he says that your argument that the shares have no value at all makes it even more difficult for you to justify a low percentage equity for me.

Second, my attorney says that the equity percentages that you cited for employees is correct and widely documented.  However, he says that the context is not correct.  Those

numbers refer to the distribution of incentive stock options (ISO's) for an already-established corporation.  For example, after an institutional round of funding, approximately 20% of the stock pool is kept aside for employee stock options.  Of that pool, an officer might expect to get an equivalent of a 5% share of the company, a VP 1%, etc.  But this is only meaningful for an established company that has funding, customers and revenue.

But  you are still in the founding stage.  The rules are different at this stage of a company.  I know you will need my assistance in building up many of the core procedures, hiring and training staff to get this business off the ground. Also, when I am on board, you will be able to use my reputation in the industry when going in to the meetings with studios and others.  In other words according to my attorney, you are relying on me as a founder, not a plain  employee. A part-time founder but a founder nonetheless. Founders typically get a far more significant share of the company than an employee because what they contribute is so vital to the company's existence.

The attorney gave me several examples of how shares have been distributed and he said in this case, you are not dealing with the large number of initial investors that we had, which opens the door for an even greater share as a founder.

January 18, 2008 1:09 AM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

About Don Dodge

I have been in the software business for more than 20 years. I started my software career with Digital Equipment Corp, aka DEC, in the database group. I worked with 5 software start-ups over the next 12 years. Forte Software was the first multiplatform object oriented development environment. AltaVista was the first search engine on the web. Napster was the first P2P file sharing network. Bowstreet was the first web services development environment. Groove Networks was the first secure P2P collaboration platform. Now I am at Microsoft...the biggest start-up in the world... working with VC's and start-ups in the greater Boston area. The goal is to help VC's and start-ups be successful with Microsoft, and together, provide great products for our customers.
Don Dodge
Information Worker Productivity
I have been in the software business for more than 20 years. I started my software career with Digital Equipment Corp, aka DEC, in the database group. I worked with 5 software start-ups over the next 12 years. Forte Software was the first multiplatform object oriented development environment. AltaVista was the first sear...

Recent Posts

Syndication

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to Technorati Favorites