Latest Blogs

from the Emerging Business Team

Edge of the Valley by Dan'l Lewin

Microsoft, ready to Deal


Courting Startups: Our Global Strategy


Should we invest in startups? That was the question I posed at the beginning of this column series in October 2005. My answer then and now is the same. Yes, but not in the traditional way a venture capital firm does. We invest our resources, people, and of course technologies in startup companies worldwide — working with VCs to enable innovation and accelerate the software ecosystem. In some cases, we acquire companies that help us accelerate our product roadmap and align with customer needs.


In fact, during our last fiscal year, we acquired nearly three times as many startups as we did the same period a year earlier. So what’s up? Why all the deal making? Clearly, market dynamics come into play.  There’s consolidation going on, and a realistic, pragmatic IPO market. While it may turn out to be one of the busiest years for IPOs since the tech crash, there’s still cautious optimism in the market and a requirement for sustainable performance. In fact, Morgan Stanley’s Mary Meeker says winning technology companies today must have (among many other things) a large market opportunity (better to have 10% and rising of a $1 billion market, then 100% of a $100 million market.) In addition, newly created regulatory hurdles are causing trepidation in the market. Some companies are even doing trial runs on their road shows, testing the company pitch with investors and bankers just to gauge the reaction before the real event.


But for us, there is another reason why startups are a target of interest and have always been. We see acquiring companies as a natural and pragmatic way to satisfy our market and customer needs, to acquire inventive new technologies, creative people, and to integrate them into our product and solution roadmap. See Pick of the Crop article in the Wall Street Journal, Online.  But you may be surprised to learn of the market areas we targeted and our sweet spot for investments.


You could say we’re on a roll, and we don’t see it letting up anytime soon. Bruce Jaffe, head of Microsoft’s Corporate Development group, a close partner organization to my responsibility, says that they have the biggest pipeline of potential deals — ever.


This column explores our acquisition strategy. We’ll talk about our appetite for acquisitions and the payoff for entrepreneurs and investors alike.


Three Quarters of a Billion Dollars— A Nice Round Number


Here are the digits worth noting: For the fiscal year 2006 which ended on June 30th, we bought 21 companies for a total of approximately three quarters of a billion dollars. That compares with just 9 companies in the prior fiscal year, valued at approximately $250 million. (See Microsoft acquisitions by year here.) Most of our acquisitions tend to be technology-based private companies. About one-half of the companies we acquired in the last year were not VC-backed, but rather backed by founders and angel investors, a growing trend with serial entrepreneurs.  I think it’s also indicative of why CEOs choose M&A as opposed to an IPO. Clearly, the regulatory market (Sarbanes-Oxley, and other new generation regulations such as HIPAA, Gramm-Leach-Bliley, etc.) is causing CEOs to rethink exit strategies. I hear time and time again from high networth CEOs and venture capitalists that the personal exposure associated with taking a fledging startup public is significant and oftentimes leads them toward acquisition as a more palatable outcome. Not surprisingly, M&A activity soared in 2005, the best year since 2000, and experts say 2006 could easily be a record year for deals.


From our point of view, here are some additional insights about our interest areas from our latest round of acquisitions:

  • One-third - based in Silicon Valley, or California.
  • One third - international acquisitions, British game developer Lionhead Studios, digital asset management company iView Multimedia, and mobile search technology provider MotionBridge, based in Paris are examples.
  • Most of our acquisitions were made by our Platform, Products and Services division, but we also made several important acquisitions in Entertainment and Devices, as well as in our Business Division.

A Globetrotting Strategy — A Different Kind of Investor


We’re courting great companies wherever they may be. And, in fact, we’re counting on our relationships with VCs worldwide to help us deepen our dialogue with the portfolio companies we should consider. We’re not just buying infrastructure, or management/technology talent, or security products; we’re buying lots of stuff in the gaming segment too, distribution content and more. Further, as web standards and services become mainstream, and all large players adhere to those standards, our platform investments will evolve, including Window Live, content and distribution relationships, SaaS, and more. And this, in turn, will likely stimulate our appetite for more acquisitions — looking for the areas where this makes the most sense.


In general, we make acquisitions for one or all of the following reasons:

  • People power and expertise (great engineering teams and operating managers)
  • Technology advantage  (adding a new incremental innovation to an existing product line, or planned product)
  • Time-to-market benefit (sometimes the market moves so fast that it makes sense for us to buy rather than build a new technology/approach … i.e. compliance, legal, audit, and security requirements as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley)
  • New market/opportunity — disruptive or new channel innovations (As just one example, Teleo got us deeper into the VoIP space.)

Our acquisitions are based on more than revenue or profits. Since we already have strong brand recognition, great sales channels, partners and existing product lines, we look to how we can leverage acquisitions into our existing customer base and distribution channels for the highest returns. Early on, we do our best to identify great engineering teams and unique technology. We form partnerships, help startups build on our platform, introduce them to VCs and more. Acquiring them sometimes happens, but it is not necessarily the ultimate goal.


Whom Did We Target? The Usual Suspects.


Many of the companies we acquired, naturally, had ongoing relationships and partnerships with Microsoft in one way or another. That’s what I mean by targeting the usual suspects. It’s important to note that working with partners and VCs around the world, we continually refine and update a very clear framework of where we are making our development investments, where we see customer direction and need, and where we see opportunity to partner for mutual benefits and transparent insight into MSFT platform roadmap. Our goal is always to be a fair, transparent partner.


Here are the 21 acquisitions we made in FY06:


You can see from this list, we’re acquiring a wide range of businesses — particularly as the industry moves forward with the programmable web and IP addresses found everywhere — from light bulbs to Nike’s. The surface area for software and solutions is amplifying our business model. And that is making us more acquisitive.


Henry Chesbrough in his book, “Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology,” said it best. He believes that the modern corporation of today must have permeable walls relative to licensing in and licensing out. In fact, I believe this is the new business model for growth. Companies’ new ideas will come from a variety of sources, not just pure internal R&D.


We’ve always licensed in, and of late, have begun to license out, given the depth and breadth of our research and development efforts. Microsoft’s IP Ventures licenses and spins out these leading-edge technologies to entrepreneurs, start-ups, and corporations as a way to both recoup a portion of our R&D investments and encourage new business investments and economic development. More on this soon.


It may surprise you to know that Microsoft in the '90s was the most acquisitive software company in the industry: midway into the new millennium, we may once again be ending this decade as the most acquisitive in the business. In fact, if you’re a startup company with promising technology, we’re ready to deal.


Published Monday, July 31, 2006 10:35 AM by admin

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

seattleduck | kevin briody - » A look into Microsoft’s acquisition strategy said:

August 21, 2006 3:47 PM
 

CourtneyGQuinn said:

Interesting article. I've recently thought of an idea that might work with Microsofts recent purchase of SeaDragon. I've got this idea that people who live in cities are being robbed of something that humans have marveled over since humans became humans. Because of light pollution a city dweller doesn't get to experience the wonder that is a clear night sky. Actually, i read that there was a blackout in LA a number of years ago and a few people called 911 because they didn't know what to make of all the strange things in the clear night sky. I don't know if said storey is true, but it makes me wonder if sky-light-polluted city dwellers would be interested in seeing stars, planets, galaxies and clusters.
Here's the idea...attach a bunch of digital cameras to computers in locations that aren't effected by light pollution. I can imagine that the sights offered from such a venture might interest a number of groups....1)astronomers (petapixel picoprocessing power (more later)), 2)astrologers (imagine being able to see your horoscope/sign rather then just read about it...), and 3)alien-terested people (if there was dozens of "light look-up" stations worldwide, i'm sure there would be many interesting UFO sightings)

Do you wonder how many CCD pixels for digicam's have been created the last few years? Has the world created more then 1 peta pixel of CCD's? What would happen if all those pixels were combined and attached so as to produce 1 or a few super, duper digital camera(s)? Can the slightest/smallest difference in make, model and manufacture of CCD pixels be used to deduce information about the light from the universe (as in, say you have an array of 100 Sony X3F4WT digital cameras (fictitious example) scanning the night sky and 100 Canon M46HT digital cameras and 100 Kodak/Flextronics SE322 model digital cameras....if all 300 were looking at the same part of the sky, would there be slight visual differences in each because of make, model and manufacture?)?

September 20, 2006 8:57 PM
 

Emerging Thoughts with Nav Bhachech said:

catching up with the goings-on in the SOA developer space - I recently read that Webmethods acquired...
September 21, 2006 3:41 AM
 

CourtneyGQuinn said:

On September 28 residents of Reykjavik in Iceland tunred off their lights in order to get a good look at the nights sky...
Perhaps if there was a websight designed to look at the nights sky from a not-so light polluted place, maybe people wouldn't need to turn out the light to get a good look. Looking around the world in near real time...the best sights from a star light night might look great on a big screen TV. Heck, i've seen a TV channel broadcast the sights from a fireplace during the holidays...perhaps people who don't have a fireplace think the view nice.

Instead of using daisy-chained digital imaging technology and computers/processors to look up....what about looking down? Digital microscopes are cheap. What if thousands of them were used to look for the slightest ripple/wave/motion coming from a secure, steady dish of water or mercury....or how about looking for the smallest movements resulting in "still" smoke/cloud chambers (have you ever looked at a stream of light coming into the window on a sunny day and noticed all the dust particles floating around?....have you ever viewed one of those seemingly random dust particles shoot up/down/around in a strange motion that the other floating particles centimeters away seem to avoid?...what caused that?)  Might multiple arrays of digital microscopes geographically situated in far-flung places detect earth or space based physics principals?
Can off the shelf digital hardware be used to gain insights into the universe?
October 2, 2006 5:33 PM
 

CourtneyGQuinn said:

Speaking of acquisitions....i read a story the other day saying that Microsoft was thinking of buying eBay. If that's the case this idea might be well suited to one of Bill Gates largest stock holdings outside of Microsoft (CN Rail). I read a book a couple of weeks back regarding the railroad industry (search/look-up my name to see how much potential i think that industry has). I wasn't surprised to learn that passenger rail travel has decreased big-time in the last 40 or 50 years (it WILL go up again in the near future). But i was surprised to learn that something called "less-then carload" shipping has also gone way, way done in terms of rail volume. Rail companies decades ago decided to concentrate on hauling bulk materials rather then small, individual consumer items. It dawned on me that catalogue companies in the late 1800's were a retailing revolution that relied on railway companies "less-then-carload" shipping possibility to sell directly to consumers.
Here's an idea...imagine a railcar/container built as a bunch of storage shelves/shells/lockers for shipping purposes. Someone selling something in one city to a person in another would only need to bring it to the rail-moved "shell shelf" to have it shipped. Say someone in Vancouver, BC sold a homemade 50 pound tree carving via eBay to someone in Seattle if they could get a good deal. As it currently stands, the cost to ship the big, bulky tree carving will probably be so high that the purchaser might think twice about buying and shipping said product. With rail shipping it costs pennies per gross tonne mile to transport something....and if the handling and distributing of a rail container/carload came down in price, then "small scale rail mail" makes sense. Imagine every big city having its own (or multiple) shell shelf rail containers connected to other big cities. With certain products buyers and sellers on eBay each might be able to save and sell more using shell shelf rail mail.

Perhaps this idea might be tied into the "Train U" idea, which is itself tied into the "trailer park-parking garage"/"mobile homes and hotels idea". Maybe the "Self Shell Shelf" rail mail terminal for each city might be located on the ground floor of the "trailer-park/parking garage" that houses students enrolled in "Train U"....
October 2, 2006 6:19 PM
 

CourtneyGQuinn said:

What's the point of this website? Is it a place for people with ideas to post them and interact with Microsoft regarding possible parnership? Or is it a website designed to sell Microsoft products above all else? Perahps posting thoughts at a website used by a 500 pound, slow moving corporation wasn't the best way to further these ideas. Maybe more nimble companies like Google, Yahoo or Apple might make these ideas work
October 8, 2006 6:37 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit
Dan'l Lewin
Corporate VP, Strategic and Emerging Business Development

Dan’l Lewin, corporate vice president for Strategic and Emerging Business Development (SEBT), is responsible for Microsoft Corp.’s global relationships with startups, venture capitalists and the business relationships with industry partners such as Adobe Systems Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc. and IBM Corp. Based in Silic...

Recent Posts

Syndication

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to Technorati Favorites